|
Post by cornvan309 on Aug 23, 2010 8:15:42 GMT -5
Seattle gets 4,000,000
Knicks get the rest of seattle picks
# 15 #21 #27 #28 # 29 # 31
|
|
|
Post by Obsidian on Aug 23, 2010 8:30:29 GMT -5
I agree. Better to get something than nothing.
|
|
|
Post by MinnesotaGM on Aug 23, 2010 9:36:48 GMT -5
0-1
6 first round picks for only $2 million? That is the definitiion of unbalanced.
|
|
|
Post by cornvan309 on Aug 23, 2010 9:39:59 GMT -5
wat how if any team needs it its my team man every trade i get u people shut it down sigh
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 on Aug 23, 2010 9:54:17 GMT -5
Eh, Seattle has been desperately trying to move these picks, and if he doesn't move them, they won't be used... thus holding up the draft (damn that was a run on sentence)
1-1
|
|
|
Post by MinnesotaGM on Aug 23, 2010 9:56:31 GMT -5
wat how if any team needs it its my team man every trade i get u people shut it down sigh Cornvan, Please, tell me how you think this trade is a fair trade? Please, tell me how you think that it is a trade that is not so lopsided in one direction (your direction) that it is not veto worthy? I really could care less if I am approving or vetoing a deal you are involved in. I never veto something because of an owner involved in it. I veto the deal. (or approve the deal). I ask you. If there were multiple teams selling 6 first or future first round picks to multiple teams for only $2 million in cash how that would affect the league as a whole? I get that Seattle is going for it this year, and I factored that into my decision. But one has to look at the intergrity of the league as well when voting. And this one is soooooo unbalanced that I feel it is easy to make that argument.
|
|
|
Post by cornvan309 on Aug 23, 2010 9:58:48 GMT -5
how is it unbalanced he wont used the picks so i am giving him some money instead and ur holding up the draft
|
|
|
Post by MinnesotaGM on Aug 23, 2010 10:01:02 GMT -5
It sets precident. But that;s fine. If the league says this is a fair trade then i am sure in the future I am gonna make a doozy of a deal with someone else and there is no way on Gods green earth that someone could argue that the totally unbalanced trade I will be benefiting from is veto-worthy.
|
|
|
Post by cornvan309 on Aug 23, 2010 10:03:56 GMT -5
ok fine dang get the stick out ur ass man have fun
|
|
|
Post by rockndoc on Aug 23, 2010 10:11:22 GMT -5
Hate to go Siddy on this, but.................
Picks have historically been worth MUCH more than this.
1-2
|
|
|
Post by cornvan309 on Aug 23, 2010 10:14:09 GMT -5
wowwww this leauge can i still have to pay for the players 2
|
|
|
Post by cornvan309 on Aug 23, 2010 10:16:08 GMT -5
i changed it to 4 mill
|
|
|
Post by rien2244 on Aug 23, 2010 10:26:46 GMT -5
2-2
everyone after #18 is a one year deal, so evn if there is a one year steal in there, who cares?
|
|
|
Post by MinnesotaGM on Aug 23, 2010 10:27:57 GMT -5
ok fine dang get the stick out ur ass man have fun Hey. I will change my voting methods when the league sets the precident with a Mod-approved trade. Until now picks have had much more value than your lousy $2 million for 6 picks. But if the Mod group as a whole decides draft picks should be valued at a much lower rate then I will conform on future voting sessions and approve such trades. You took the "have fun" and not look at your team and your trades in the past closely method. Look where it got you and your franchise. No where. Maybe you should put some more work into looking at players and thinking about the moves you make before you make them. This is the first trade that I can remember seeing you involved in where I think you were/are on the clear winning side of and I have seen you make a lot of bad trades. So maybe you should put a stick up ur ass and do your homework a bit more before making moves.
|
|
|
Post by cornvan309 on Aug 23, 2010 10:30:17 GMT -5
ummm i took over this team and it was my 1styear in a league like this so i messed up but i prolly won more leagues then u little buddy and i changed it to 4 mill
|
|